Description Paper on Gustav Klimt

DESCRIPTION opus ART INTO TEXT The purpose of this short paper is to hone your abilities in using enounces to come across and understand the physical qualities of a pass water of art. By writing about art, you volition take on the responsibility of examining it closely, organizing your perceptions and thoughts about it, and conveying in text an organized and clear summary of your opthalmic analysis. First, need a hit to examine. There is no limit to which work you may choose, except that it must picture from within our time period (the year 1400 of the common era to the present).If you have concerns about your choice, consult the professor. beguile do not choose a work that has been discussed extensively in class or in the text contain. You may choose a work that you can see first-hand in Hong Kong (at for instance the Hong Kong Museum of Art or the Hong Kong Heritage Museum, or a work of public sculpture). If you opt to do this, please identify where the prey resides in y our paper. If you desire to choose a work from the West or other places not flat accessible, please find and utilize many reproductions of it, from as many different angles as possible, and with different levels of detail.Please withdraw relevant images to the end of your paper (do not include them in the text). After choosing the work, you will then choke considerable time examining it (no less than 30 minutes is recommended). Then, take notes on what you see. Describe the media, principles of design and visual elements that you find in the work. Think about how line, volume, scale, balance, and/or visual rhythm argon used in the work, if appropriate. Pay attention to as much of the surface of the work as you can see.Do physical features of the work suggest the purpose of its creation, the meaning it is trying to communicate, or its use or original physical consideration? What can you infer about the culture that made this object from its physical features? Finally, compose a 2 to 4 page (double spaced, with regular fonts and margins) essay summarizing your findings. The bulk of the paper should be a well-organized description and titular analysis. You should organize this part of the paper logically, i. e. there should be an order to your description and analysis.Then, taking the features and relationships in the work that you find most compelling and important, assess its cultural meaning and/or significance based upon your observations. This should be your conclusion. Do not conduct research for this assignment. The focus here should be on honing your observational skills. You will be graded on clarity of writing and word choice (25%), organization (25%), thoroughness of observation (25%), and the plausibleness of your conclusions based on evidence at hand (25%). Paper due in class on Monday, September 24, 2012. Penalties for not following instructionsDoes not meet the page minimum dropped a earn grade. Fonts and/or margins are oversized in order to meet page minimum dropped tail fin points. Illustrations are within the text rather than appended to the end dropped a letter grade. Work chosen has been discussed in book or class extensively dropped a letter grade. Research has been conducted dropped two letter grades. Plagiary automatic zero. utilise of previously submitted material automatic zero. Work is not within specified time period dropped five points. Excessive redundancy/use of filler points subtracted from thoroughness score.Farriss rules of good formal nonfiction writing bend use of first and second person pronouns (I, you, we, us). Avoid passive voice. Avoid redundancies, both in word use and content. Be sure of the meaning of a word before making use of it. modify phrasing in order to be direct about what you want to convey. Organize your thoughts before kickoff to write. When not writing dialogue, paragraphs must be at least three sentences long. Sentences in a paragraph should address a single subject. Avoid st arting a sentence with a conjunction. Avoid contractions. drop unnecessary words. Assess evidence, not subjective reaction.